ТЕМА: Some people say that genetically modified food is hazardous to health.

What is your opinion? Do you agree with this statement?
Write 200 – 250 words.
Use the following plan:
− make an introduction (state the problem)
− express your personal opinion and give 2–3 reasons for your opinion
− express an opposing opinion and give 1–2 reasons for this opposing opinion
− explain why you don’t agree with the opposing opinion
− make a conclusion restating your position

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Данная тема открыта для регистрации и выбора темы конкурсного эссе в рамках конкурса “Wizards for Essays”

Внимание! Прежде чем пройти регистрацию на конкурс, выбрав данную тему , внимательно ознакомьтесь с его положением.

Положение о конкурсе.

Пример прохождения регистрации при выборе темы:

Тему выбрал Иванов Иван Николаевич,
ученик 10 класса МБОУ "СОШ № 4" города Екатеринбурга,
учитель Сергеева Антонина Дмитриевна.

Тему выбрал Лаврентьев Дмитрий Сергеевич,
ученик 8 класса МАОУ "Лицея № 1" города Балаково,
учитель Минакова Вера Александровна.

Вы допущены к участию в конкурсе.
Данная тема закреплена за вами.
Тема будет разблокирована для публикации вашего конкурсного эссе 10 октября 2015 года.

Some people say that genetically modified food is dangerous to their health. Others believe that it is absolutely harmless and has a number of advantages.
Nowadays people are getting more and more concerned about the food they eat as it is closely connected with the way they look and feel. That is why there are so many arguments about the safety of genetically modified food.
I disagree with opinion that GM food is dangerous for health because I trust in sciense and sciense says "there is no harm from GM products".
GM food is our feature. Only GM food can save humanity from hunger because GM food has better Immunity then natural food and plants with GM have more fruits then plants without GM.
People who think different have their own arguments:first their argument is: scientists are not sure in safety of GM food, and second argumentis their own fear of new and unknown.
I don't agree with them because:
First: their information is outdated.
Second: people, who don't know something about GM listen to the same people and so stereotypes appear.
I am not angry at them, because people always fear obscurity and I am sure that people will chanche their mind about GM when will know more about this technology.